I just finished some preliminary power tests on my IO that I wanted to share.
The bottom line is that the "Stock" IO CPU with any memory configuration is an ideal candidate for a battery-operated device. I'll try to get to some real world tests done in a couple of days, but it would appear that you could derive five to eight hours of continous IO operation using a 1600ma AA NiMH power pack!
This is very good news for those who want to use the IO as a mobile player, as the power requirements of the IO, HD, Fan and standard WinChip processor are quite low... 200-400ma! NiMH power is ideal for this application, as the power curve is very flat. You could probably use the IO's power supply to recharge the pack in about an hour. You'd have to monitor it though, as NiMH does not fare well when over-charged. If the pack starts getting hot, unplug it!
The same low-power profile can not be seen with the WinChip2 processor, which seems to use about 1a, regardless of the task it performs. This translated into an estimated 1.5 hours of battery operation. As the WinChip2 runs cooler, I was very surprised to see these power figures. Any suggestions you might have regarding reducing the power consumption of this chip would be appreciated. I'll retest and post the results. Unless there's a fix or you REALLY NEED the extra power, I'd suggest sticking to the stock CPU for the car and other mobile apps...
Other hardware: My USB-powered USB/ethernet hub (with individually powered USB speakers and CDRW connected) pulls about 50-100ma. I also tested with 32mb, 64mb and 128mb of PC100 SODIMM RAM, and memory size makes very little difference in the power consumption. All the tests below were done using a 6.5mb 2.5" Hitachi drive with a Tennmax 5v Lasagna fan in operation during the tests.
Limitations: The test equipment used was an AstroFlight WhattMeter. It was designed to test the battery packs used for electronic flight. These packs generally draw 10a or greater. Because of the normally high current-levels, the Whattmeter's resolution is limited to 100ma (.1a)... still the information derived looks very promising. If you want a little more accuracy, apply the following formula by dividing the watts by the volts to derive amperage...
watts(w)/volts(e)=amps(i) ... if you have more accurate equipment, I encourage you to duplicate and verify these results.
The Whattmeter was placed on the 19v supply line between the IO and the wall-wart. Power was tested during several different operational phases, including the performance of Sandra 2000 benchmarks.
"Real-world" tests using NiMH packs will follow... YMMV
Stock IO: WinChip200/32mb Memory
Process Amps Volts Watts
Off 0a 19.2v 0w
POST .0a 18.2v 2w
ScanDisk .1a 18.2v 4w
WinBoot .3a 18.2v 7w
WinRest .1a 18.3v 4w
WinDefrag .3a 18.4v 6w
WinAmp .2a 18.4v 5w
IEonline .2a 18.3v 6w
SandraCPU .2a 18.2v 6w
SandraDisk .2a 18.3v 6w
Stock IO: WinChip200/32mb Memory
w/D-Link DSB-H3E Hub
Process Amps Volts Watts
Off 0a 19.2v 0w
Post .1a 18v 3w
ScanDisk .2a 18.4v 6w
WinBoot .4a 18.4v 8w
WinRest .2a 18.5v 5w
WinDefrag .3a 18.4v 7w
WinAmpUSB .3a 18.4v 7w
SandraCPU .3a 18.4v 7w
SandraDisk .4a 18.4v 8w
WinChip2 w/32mb Memory
Process Amps Volts Watts
Off 0a 19.2v 0w
Post 0.8a 18.7v 17w
ScanDisk 1a 18.7v 20w
WinBoot 1a 18.6v 21w
WinRest 0.9a 18.7v 19w
WinDefrag 1a 18.6v 21w
WinAmp 1a 18.7v 19w
SandraCPU 1a 18.6v 20w
SandraDisk 1a 18.6v 21w
WinChip2 w/128mb Memory
Process Amps Volts Watts
Off 0a 19.2v 0w
Post 0.8a 18.8v 18w
ScanDisk 1a 18.7v 20w
WinBoot 1a 18.6v 21w
WinRest 0.9a 18.7v 19w
WinDefrag 1a 18.6v 21w
WinAmp 1a 18.7v 20w
SandraCPU 1a 18.6v 20w
SandraDisk 1a 18.6v 21w